top of page
Search

Designing Research

  • Writer: Ethen Dent
    Ethen Dent
  • Oct 3, 2021
  • 2 min read

Today's session consisted of learning processes that tailored our research in hopes of reducing the risks that would coincide with our business ideas.

IDENTIFYING RISKS


  • Type A: does the problem exist?

  • Type B: is there a solution already?

  • Type C: do people care enough to switch?

  • Type D: (optional) other assumptions about details of your idea.

PRIMARY & SECONDARY RESEARCH


When asking questions to the public or via survey, there are a couple rules that you need to follow to reduce the risk of getting false data.

AVOID LEADING QUESTIONS

Leading questions can retrieve responses based on emotional bias. Remember: people might say what you want to hear.

AVOID HYPOTHETICAL QUESTIONS

Giving the respondent a hypothetical forces them to imagine a scenario and think about their response. The respondent might find this confusing and difficult to respond to as they might not be able to imagine the scenario.

MAKE A CHOICE BETWEEM OPEN AND CLOSE QUESTIONS


KISS - KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID

Over complicating questions will most likely receive over complicated responses.

ASK ABOUT THE NEGATIVES


ASK ABOUT QUANTITIES



My Example


Assumption - assuming our home workers do not go to the establishment itself that makes the sandwich. Sandwich shop could be within walking distance.


- Do you like sandwiches?

- If so, Would you consider walking to a sandwich shop from home?

- How far away do you live from a sandwich shop?


REFLECTION

"Identifying risks for my business idea is a procedure that I've undertaken previously (~two weeks ago). Seeing a layout like this tempts me to redo a risk assessment using the methods covered today. Especially since my idea remains in limbo (feasibility of the business was questionable). Something that might be worth doing, is allowing a peer to add to my risk assessment after pitching to them. Having a second input to poke holes in the business idea would reveal more risks/assumptions. I think this would be even more effective when including the principals of the primary and secondary research covered today."

What I’ve been listening to:


Comments

bottom of page